Analysis Of Accountability And Effectiveness Of Social Assistance Spending At The DKI Jakarta Provincial Government
Abstract
This study examines accountability and effectiveness in social aid spending in DKI Jakarta Province. This study intends to investigate how transparency and accountability might enhance the effectiveness of the program. Using Jonathan Koppell's (2005) theory amongs: transparency, liability, control, responsibility, and responsiveness, this research employs a qualitative technique, utilizing interviews. Data analysis methods include data reduction, presentation, and verification. shows that accountability in the accountability of social programs has been implemented in the DKI Regional Government. The result shows that accountability in social programs has been implemented in the DKI Regional Government. The implications of this study are expected to help improve the disbursement of social assistance funds for the DKI Provincial Government, as well as district and village/sub-district governments. The DKI Jakarta Provincial Government is a provincial-level autonomous territory in Indonesia's capital, overseen by the Governor The implications of this study are expected to help improve the disbursement of social assistance funds for the DKI Provincial Government, as well as district and village/sub-district governments.
References
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2023). Temuan BPK atas Rp197,55 Miliar Tidak Tersalurkan untuk KJP Plus dan KJMU.pdf. Jakarta.Bpk.Go.Id. https://jakarta.bpk.go.id/temuan-bpk-rp-19755-miliar-tidak-tersalurkan-untuk-kjp-plus-dan-kjmu/
Dandi Darmadi, Hamsina, Muhammad Rusdi, & Nur Indrayati Nur Indar. (2022). Akuntabilitas Belanja Daerah di Pemerintah Kabupaten Luwu Utara. Journal Publicuho, 5(3), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.25
Hakiki, M., Indriani, E., & Suryantara, A. B. (2023). Analisis Transparansi, Akuntabilitas dan Konsep Value For Money Atas Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) (Studi pada Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Lombok Utara Tahun 2021). MANTAP: Journal of Management Accounting, Tax and Production, 1(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.57235/mantap.v1i2.1369
Halim, A., & Kusufi, S. (2017). Teori Konsep dan Aplikasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Salemba Empat.
Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the chalenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x.
Kuntadi, C., & Dian Rosdiana. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Efektivitas Penyerapan Anggaran Belanja Pendidikan: Perencanaan Anggaran, Peraturan, Koordinasi (Literature Review). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 4(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v4i2.1201
Mahmudi. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Pulbik (Revisi). UII Press.
Mahsun, M. (2019). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik (E. I. Riyani (ed.); 1st ed.). Universitas Terbuka.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (Terbaru). Andi Yogyakarta.
Mikael, E., Herminawaty Abubakar, & Miah Said. (2021). Akuntabilitas & Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. In A. Musfirah, A. Puspita, & Hasriani (Eds.), Mikael Edowai, Herminawaty Abubakar, Miah Said. Pusaka Almaida.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 Tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Pub. L. No. 15, 1 (2006).
Tinangon, J. J., Puasa, F., & Manossoh, H. (2021). Analisis Akuntabilitas Belanja Bantuan Sosial Pada Pemerintah Kota Manado. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing “GOODWILL,” 12(2), 464–481.
WARTA PEMERIKSA. (2022). LHP Kinerja atas Efektivitas Pengelolaan KJP Plus dan KJMU Pemprov DKI Jakarta.pdf. Wartapemeriksa.Bpk.Go.Id. https://wartapemeriksa.bpk.go.id/?p=39500
Wartapemeriksa. (2023). Data tak Valid, Penyaluran BLT Desa Berisiko Salah Sasaran. Wartapemeriksa.Bpk.Go.Id. https://wartapemeriksa.bpk.go.id/?p=44091
